posted by [identity profile] rfunk.livejournal.com at 02:59am on 04/10/2004
I have mixed feelings about compiling everything from source to do upgrades. On a server it requires having the compile toolchain available rather than deleted for safety, and on a desktop it requires some really long compiles, such as for KDE. (I assume cvsup speeds the update of the actual code; "cvs update" can take forever on a huge tree.)

On the other hand, it does make custom code changes a little more straightforward.

I'm still not clear on how ports are upgraded. My OpenBSD experience with them was that they're great on first installation, but a pain when anything needs to be upgraded.

Anyway, I've been meaning to ask you about FreeBSD anyway (for servers), since I know you're a fan and I trust your opinion.
 
posted by [identity profile] silicon-mayhem.livejournal.com at 02:43pm on 04/10/2004
portupgrade.
http://www.freebsddiary.org/portupgrade.php
 
posted by [identity profile] rfunk.livejournal.com at 03:09pm on 04/10/2004
Thanks, I'll take a look. Got your battery charged up again? :-)
 
posted by [identity profile] silicon-mayhem.livejournal.com at 04:03pm on 04/10/2004
Yup. I'll be smarter next time, and bring an adapter.
 
posted by [identity profile] stega.livejournal.com at 03:54am on 07/10/2004
I would run FreeBSD on a box before anything else (except for in a desktop env--as for that I like OS X) Currently I have two FreeBSD boxes that are part of the purgatory cluster. I don't actually admin them, but a third machine is due to come online if I ever get around to building a new kernel for it, and that one is going to be the main log repository/processing site. When I was in hell...errr...PGP, everything I built for them was on FreeBSD. The servers were very solid.

April

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
        1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13 14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30