rfunk: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] rfunk at 05:54pm on 18/10/2006
I forgot to mention this a couple days ago, though you may have seen it in the news. NORAD's Cheyenne Mountain underground war room facility is being retired, in favor of a nearby Air Force base.

What makes this news noteworthy to me is this bit:

Until the later years of the Cold War, when more accurate and high-yield bombs were developed, Cheyenne Mountain could probably have even withstood a direct hit....

Keating said the new control room, in contrast, could be damaged if a terrorist commandeered a jumbo jet and somehow knew exactly where to crash it. But "how unlikely is that? We think very," Keating said.


Yeah, nothing like that has ever happened before, right?

Not that I have an opinion on whether the ultimate security decision is a good one, but at least the assumptions presented here seem a bit off.
Mood:: disturbed

Reply

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

April

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
        1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13 14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30