Veepstakes : comments.
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
|
2
|
3
|
||||
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13 |
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
(no subject)
But Kerry/Clark runs a close second to me. I liked Clark best from the beginning. Besides, didn't he get more votes in the primaries than Dean?
Kerry/Dean is pretty far down on the list. He seems like a whiner, and a bit of a jerk. Of course, Kerry seems like Lurch, so it might balance out well.
Ugh. Why can't the Dem's field a candidate I could genuinely like? Is that so much to ask?
(no subject)
I don't think primary votes matter for the VP. The veepstakes never comes down to "who got more primary votes"; it's fairly rare for the VP to be one of the primary compatitors anyway. Also, exit polls showed lots of people liking Dean better but voting Kerry because they thought he had a better chance of winning, and their biggest concern was getting rid of Bush.
Obviously I disagree with your assessment of Dean, for many reasons I won't go into now, but the fact that you do hold that opinion is important, since you're probably not the only one.
And actually it is too much to ask for either party to field a candidate that any particular person actually likes; the country is so diverse that the final 2/4 candidates are necessarily a compromise. This is what the Naderites fail to recognize. (Along with the fact that the two-party system is a direct result of our system of voting, rather than a conspiracy of those parties.)
(no subject)
The media painted him an interesting colour.
going home with the ball
Eh? OK, that part I have to take strong exception to. The other primary losers took their balls and went home, but Dean turned around and rather quickly converted his organization into one working hard for Kerry and other candidates all the way down the line. Of the primary challengers, I think only Dean and Edwards seem to have stuck around working hard for Kerry.