(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] rfunk.livejournal.com at 01:12pm on 12/05/2005
Whether cause or effect, this still seems to indicate that it's biological, rather than the choice that so many people seem to think it is.

Of course, standard disclaimers about scientific repeatability apply.
[parent entry] [link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] jonobie.livejournal.com at 03:48pm on 12/05/2005
Well, I read the researcher as allowing that a person might make a choice, and then the biological change might follow.

I know of at least one other straight guy to comment on this -- see
http://www.livejournal.com/users/mdf356/10146.html

So you're not totally alone. :)

Cheers,
Jonobie
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

cause & effect

posted by [identity profile] rfunk.livejournal.com at 04:07pm on 12/05/2005
OK, I didn't get the biology-follows-choice thing from the paragraph you quoted, but now that I've had a chance to read the NYT story I see the following paragraph:
Alternatively, Dr. Savic's finding could be just a consequence of straight and gay men's using their brain in different ways.

[link] [parent] [reply]

April

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
        1
 
 2
 
 3
 
4
 
 5
 
 6
 
 7
 
 8
 
 9
 
 10
 
11
 
 12
 
 13
1
 14
 
 15
 
 16
 
 17
 
18
 
 19
 
 20
 
 21
 
 22
 
 23
 
 24
 
25
 
 26
 
 27
 
 28
 
 29
 
 30