ext_48587 ([identity profile] chronarchy.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] rfunk 2005-03-02 02:33 pm (UTC)

Re: sources

Most of the time they are :) The only real issue with books like that is that books like that usually have the author scurrying around for references, and once they have one reference, they move on. In such a dictionary, it's almost certainly too much to ask 'em to check out their sources thouroughly, though.

Of course, then you get things like the Miranda Green's Dictionary of Celtic Myth and Legend which has some really, really good stuff, followed by some really outlandish claims. It's most amusing when they cite sources and then come to completely different conclusions :)

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org