(Reply).
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
chronarchy.livejournal.com at 08:58pm on 19/05/2004| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
||||
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13 |
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
I despise that term. I've been hearing it for a while.
Someone in Congress was recently talking about overturning Marbury v. Madison because that's where "judicial activism" started.
Of course, the guy had a point: the Supreme Court doesn't have the right to overturn laws on the basis of constitutionality according to the Constitution. They kind of gave themselves that power. But I personally think it's *very* justified.
Time to go read my constitution to make sure I'm right about that previous paragraph. . .